Over the weekend, the proverbial doo-doo hit the proverbial fan for one of our members. It's been a lousy weekend. The owner of a home sewing pattern company (let's call her Tammy) has accused our friend (let's call her Amy) of using her retail pattern to make her products. From what I know personally and from what can be determined from a cursory comparison of the two items via photos- there's no legitimacy to the claim. Tammy didn't even email, write or call Amy to say that she thought her patterns were infringed upon. She just posted the claim to her website with Amy's logo displayed; news of which has spread via consumer blogs and forums that specialize in this niche product.
Amy has worked tirelessly to become one of the leaders in her niche. She's well known, consumers love her products. The items are discussed endlessly in blogs and forums. As it happens, Tammy also sells ready made products made of her pattern. Her products aren't so successful; her reputation of poor fit and quality are cited as ongoing issues. Worse, she resides in California and she doesn't have a license. Ouch. One would think she would have tidied up that detail before creating a lot of publicity for herself. She thinks she doesn't need a license because she doesn't make "garments" (isn't underwear a garment?). Not that it matters, the state of California takes a dim view of manufacturer's self-serving interpretive semantics. In sum, Tammy's integrity is questionable with her history of only following rules or accepted standard practices that suit her.